Vector & embedding security testing
Probe the RAG pipeline's storage layer, not just its retrieval quality — can embeddings be inverted back to source text, can one tenant's query surface another tenant's documents, can a crafted document poison what gets embedded and returned.
Published August 22, 2026
How it works
Retrieval evaluation asks whether the right passages come back; this method asks whether the storage layer underneath is safe to hold what it holds. Embedding-inversion attacks reconstruct meaningful fragments of the original text from its vector alone, which matters wherever the embedded content is private. Access-control testing checks whether a multi-tenant vector store actually isolates rows by tenant or namespace, rather than relying on the application layer to always filter correctly. Ingestion testing checks whether an attacker-crafted document, once embedded, can be pulled back by an unrelated query and trusted as if it were legitimate context — the storage-side half of a poisoning or indirect-injection attack. Stale-embedding testing checks that deleting a source document actually removes what was derived from it.
When to use it
Any RAG system storing embeddings from private or multi-tenant sources; before allowing externally sourced documents into an index that any user's queries can reach.
Limitations
Embedding-inversion resistance depends heavily on the embedding model and dimensionality, so results don't transfer across models. Access-control checks only cover the isolation boundaries tested, not every possible tenancy misconfiguration.
Cite this
Qlarify Labs. (2026). Vector & embedding security testing. Retrieved from https://labs.qlarify.fi/evals/vector-embedding-security-testing


